Differences between revisions 20 and 23 (spanning 3 versions)
Revision 20 as of 2009-10-21 00:33:02
Size: 4125
Editor: c-67-176-12-8
Comment:
Revision 23 as of 2009-12-02 02:12:16
Size: 1050
Editor: c-67-176-12-8
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
= Implementation Status =
== Updated Wed 09-09-2009 ==
= Current Tasklist =
== Updated Tues 12-01-2009 ==
== SLONY ==
=== subscribe_series() ===
 * 80% complete
 * modifications to get_slony_logs and the slony1 dump scripts are in progress (for integration with subscribe_series)
 * subscribe series (end2end) should be ready for installation/testing by end of day Wed (12-2-2009)
=== publish_series() ===
 * Design is complete
 * on hold until subscribe_series is complete
 * ETA: Monday 12-14
== WARM Standby ==
=== dcs servers ===
 * initial design / setup in progress
 * NFS mounts complete (setup by Keh-Cheng)
 * ETA: completion should be early/mid this afternoon (12-1-2009)
Line 9: Line 22:

1. pitrBackup = 100% complete (We may still find bugs as we engage in further testing)

2. walBackup = 100% complete (We may still find bugs as we engage in further testing)

3. Implement changes based on feedback if needed

4. Unit testing - 100% (Basic Unit tests)

5. Install 'Package” as a directory structure that will contain all future 'tools'
/bin, /etc, /tmp, /log, ...
Installed on hmidb (after the move to hmidb0 we'll setup the final packages)

6. Setup backup jobs (pending move to hmidb0)
Cron entry to run the base file system backup (I suggest once/quarter)
Cron entry to archive the WAL segments (monthly)
Optional additional base file system backups to alternate locations

The toolset will be run from the warm standby server


== Warm Standby ==

 * Documented strategy
  * Strategy fully dependant on the Backup / Recovery strategy and defined manual steps

  * We'll need to address the re-setup of SLONY after a fAIL over as part of the upcoming 'Data Replication' strategy

  * I successfully tested the backup of a running warm standby server and then recovering from the warm standby base backup and the subsequent archived WAL files from the master

  * walBackup script 100% complete
  
  * walBackup Unit Testing - 100% complete (Basic unit tests)

  * Still To Do: Revise / make more clear & easy to follow the recovery plan



== Web db Plan ==

 * Strategy documented - initial pass (100%)

== SLONY Plan ==
  
  * SLONY v2 must be used if we want to use PostgreSQL 8.4
  
  * SLONY-1 2.03 (release Candidate) recommended due to a few key bugs in 2.01 and 2.02

  * Next Steps:

    * Define SLONY Architecture

    * Define Log Shipping process

    * Build SLONY scripts/tools
 
    * Implement & Test



== Currently In Progress ==

   * Setup of a new (local) warm standby server (done)

   * further testing of the current backup scripts (done)

   * Design of the SLONY control modules (done)

   * Revise / make more clear & easy to follow the warm standby recovery plan (pending)

   * End2end testing:
      * setup 4 VM's (done)
      * install postgres on nodes 1 & 2 (done)
      * setup warm standby (done)
      * install PITR backup scripts (done)
      * install slony control scripts (done)
      * setup initial slony cluster (done, pending re-starts as needed)
      * test warm standby failover (done - first pass - success with caveats)
      * test slony switchover / switch back (done - success)
      * test pitr recovery (pending)
      * setup slony log shipping (pending)
      * test slony log shipping receiver (pending)
      * document end2end test results (pending)
      * add slony scripts to add/remove things from the slony cluster (pending)
      * test the add/remove things to slony script(s) (pending)

      * NOTES:
      we need to manage consistency of the pitr backups off the warm standby ourselves
      based on discussions with the Postgres development team I believe we should test the following:
         * shutdown the warm standby database(s), run the xfsdump, then restart (back into recovery mode) the warm standby database(s)
            * creates a risk factor in that the warm standby is down during the dump

         * Force a checkpoint on the master, watch the standby logs for the completion of the checkpoint and then run the xfsdump
            * creates the need to manage the 'window' between checkpoints and ensure that its long enough to do our xfsdump
            * This involves the monitoring/tweaking of the # of checkpoint segments and the checkpoint_timeout in relation to current traffic volues

         * Both of these, plus the single failover script has introduces unexpected issues and/or unexpected scope, thus pushing our timeline out.
            I'll try and make up some time in the next (monitoring) phase of the schedule.
 * New design doc in place
 * Code construction on hold until slony is complete
== Additional Tasks ==
 * single-command warm standby failover
 * single-command warm standby re-set
 * add/drop things from SLONY script
 * graphing tool to show avg slony load per object
 * Monitoring

Kevins's archive

Anchor(mostrecent)

Current Tasklist

Updated Tues 12-01-2009

SLONY

subscribe_series()

  • 80% complete
  • modifications to get_slony_logs and the slony1 dump scripts are in progress (for integration with subscribe_series)
  • subscribe series (end2end) should be ready for installation/testing by end of day Wed (12-2-2009)

publish_series()

  • Design is complete
  • on hold until subscribe_series is complete
  • ETA: Monday 12-14

WARM Standby

dcs servers

  • initial design / setup in progress
  • NFS mounts complete (setup by Keh-Cheng)
  • ETA: completion should be early/mid this afternoon (12-1-2009)

Backup / Recovery

  • New design doc in place
  • Code construction on hold until slony is complete

Additional Tasks

  • single-command warm standby failover
  • single-command warm standby re-set
  • add/drop things from SLONY script
  • graphing tool to show avg slony load per object
  • Monitoring

JsocWiki: KevinsProgress (last edited 2013-05-01 04:35:27 by localhost)